特级无码毛片免费视频播放,国产午夜亚洲精品久久,国产午夜精品理论片久久影院,内射巨臀欧美在线视频,精品伊人久久大线蕉色首页,亚洲色偷偷偷综合网,亚洲成在线aⅴ免费视频,亚洲444kkkk在线观看

Unitalen Client Water Babies Sued Former Franchisees in Defending Brand Rights and Won First Instance Judgment

September 30, 2022

Case Brief:

The plaintiff, Water Babies Limited (hereinafter referred to as "Water Babies"), was founded in the United Kingdom in 2002 and is a pioneer in the field of baby swimming. Since it was founded, Water Babies has focused on the field of baby swimming, and its pioneering "parent-child swimming" mode, "music teaching" mode, and highly professional "underwater photography" services for babies have been widely praised by parents. Water Babies has spread its business all over Britain, Ireland, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Canada and other countries through the franchise business model. Its baby swimming brands "water babies" and "沃特寶貝" have developed into international chain brands and entered the Chinese market in 2016.

Water Babies owns the trademarks Reg. No. 24419673A for "", Reg. No. G1203817 for "", Reg. No. 17855314 for "說明: 675d078e8bf29d015cd7e5a44f828825", and Reg. No. 44131042A for "WATER BABIES" (hereinafter collectively referred to as "the involved trademarks"). The involved trademarks have been approved for registration on services such as "Providing swimming courses and instruction, personal trainer services in the field of swimming, and entertainment services", "Personal trainer services on swimming, entertainment with the nature of swimming, underwater photography", "Providing training services, i.e. swimming courses and instruction; Photography", and "Providing waterpark services; Providing sports facilities; Sports training services; Providing swimming pool services; Swimming training" in Class 41 respectively and successively from 2013 to 2020.

Hengqin Bubble Baby Education Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Hengqin Bubble") is the general agent of Water Babies in China.

The legal representative of Water Bubble Education Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Water Bubble") and Liaoning Tianyi Shuiyi Technology Information Consulting Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Tianyi Shuiyi") both signed franchise agency agreements with the Chinese agent of Water Babies. Thereafter, said franchise agency agreements were rescinded without being actually performed. Water Bubble and Tianyi Shuiyi, knowing the trademarks of Water Babies, used marks same as or similar to the registered trademarks of Water Babies without the permission of the latter, and falsely used the information and development history of Water Babies in its misleading publicity.

Water Babies and Hengqin Bubble claimed that the above-mentioned acts of Water Bubble and Tianyi Shuiyi infringed their legitimate rights and interests, and filed a lawsuit with the People's Court of Chaoyang District, Beijing against Water Bubble and Tianyi Shuiyi for trademark infringement and unfair competition disputes in February 2021.

The People's Court of Chaoyang District ruled that the use of "water bubles", "water babies", "沃特寶貝", "water bubbles", "water bubies" and other marks in the operation of underwater photography, parent-child swimming training, maternity swimming courses and other services by Water Bubble and Tianyi Shuiyi constitutes trademark infringement. The contents such as "headquartered in the UK, founded in 2002" claimed by the defendants in publicity are false advertising. In the judgment, the two defendants are ordered to cease the acts of infringement, eliminate the influence and compensate the plaintiffs for economic losses and reasonable expenses of 950,000 yuan in total.

After the first instance judgment was made, the two defendants filed an appeal during the appeal period, and the case is still in the second instance trial at present.

Typical Significance:

This case is a relatively typical case of trademark infringement and unfair competition dispute. The review on the defense of legitimate trademark grants and the relevant determination on the acts of false publicity and unfair competition in the first instance judgment are of certain reference value and learning significance for similar cases.

 

Keywords

主站蜘蛛池模板: 久久久久久无码日韩欧美| 亚洲日韩电影久久| 亚洲婷婷六月的婷婷| 人人玩人人添人人澡免费 | 99久久免费国产精品四虎| 高清偷自拍亚洲精品三区| 中文无码高潮到痉挛在线视频 | 无码人妻巨屁股系列| 动漫美女h黄动漫在线观看| 日本成片区免费久久| 日韩av一国产av一中文字慕| 亚洲国产精品一区二区美利坚| 2021自拍偷在线精品自拍偷| 秋霞av一区二区二三区| 亚洲色无码播放亚洲成av| 国产成人影院一区二区三区| 免费无码无遮挡裸体视频在线观看| 久久综合九色综合网站| 久99国产精品人妻aⅴ| 亚洲成av大片大片在线播放| 国产艳妇av在线出轨| 国产精品无码一区二区在线看| 中文成人无码精品久久久动漫| 人人玩人人添人人澡免费 | 日本无码v视频一区二区| 男男无码gv片在线看| 国产a v高清一区二区三区| 日本一二免费不卡区| 国产综合精品久久丫| 亚洲成av人无码不卡影片| 五十路熟女一区二区三区 | 亚洲国产精品无码中文lv| 尤物av无码色av无码麻豆| 亚洲成在人线a免费77777| 一本到中文无码av在线精品 | 亚洲gv猛男gv无码男同短文| 新婚人妻不戴套国产精品| 久久av无码aⅴ高潮av喷吹 | 精品一区二区三区影院在线午夜| 国产又色又爽又黄刺激视频| 成人无码a区在线观看视频|